This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
handover:a1511 [2015/02/23 08:18] Lucia McCallum |
handover:a1511 [2015/02/23 08:24] Lucia McCallum |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
**Yarragadee 12m:** | **Yarragadee 12m:** | ||
- | Disk VSN: HOB+0130 | + | Disk VSN: HOB+0130 (changed to HOB+0102 part way through, details below) |
Data volume at beginning: 0 GB (missing 6 GB) | Data volume at beginning: 0 GB (missing 6 GB) | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
* 21:11:08 UT: Wind stowed, missed scans 053-2111 through 053-2119 (Ross). | * 21:11:08 UT: Wind stowed, missed scans 053-2111 through 053-2119 (Ross). | ||
* 07:39 UT : noticed that the autocorrelation was terrible. So was the next scan. Previous scans might also be bad, I just didn't notice. When I tried to investigate, the field system reported that the connection was lost to the mark 5. Bad scans (at least) from 054-0738 to 054-0742. (Ellen) | * 07:39 UT : noticed that the autocorrelation was terrible. So was the next scan. Previous scans might also be bad, I just didn't notice. When I tried to investigate, the field system reported that the connection was lost to the mark 5. Bad scans (at least) from 054-0738 to 054-0742. (Ellen) | ||
- | * 07:44 UT schedule halted, restarted DBBC and the field system. Missed scans 054-0744 to 054-0817. | + | * 07:44 UT schedule halted, restarted DBBC and the field system. This didn't help. Called Imogen, she said the pointers were wrong and so we need to change the module. Test recording went ok so schedule was restarted. (Ellen) |
+ | * Missed scans 054-0744 to 054-0821. (Ellen) | ||
+ | * 08:18 UT schedule resumed on new module: HOB+0102, first scan 054-0823. This makes the disc position about 2080 GB behind schedule. (Ellen) | ||
{{tag>}} | {{tag>}} |