This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
handover:gt05 [2016/11/05 03:14] Bryn Emptage |
handover:gt05 [2016/11/05 03:18] Bryn Emptage |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Observer: Arwin | Observer: Arwin | ||
- | * 0100UT Experiment started OK. Checked with the prc file which loaded ''rfpic=cross,direct'' when ''schedule=gt05yg'' was entered. Recording for sband=direct(20v) from 0100 UT onwards. ifa power levels were very high, ifa was approx 39000 whilst ifb was around 29000. See Image 1 below | + | * 0100UT Experiment started OK. Checked with the prc file which loaded ''rfpic=cross,direct'' when ''schedule=gt05yg,#1'' was entered. Recording for sband=direct(20v) from 0100 UT onwards. ifa power levels were very high, ifa was approx 39000 whilst ifb was around 29000. See Image 1 below |
* 0142UT Entered ''rfpic=*,cross''. Recording for Sband=cross from 12:42UT onwards. The power levels were under control for this setting, ifa settled around 24800 whilst ifb settled around 29000. See Image 2 below | * 0142UT Entered ''rfpic=*,cross''. Recording for Sband=cross from 12:42UT onwards. The power levels were under control for this setting, ifa settled around 24800 whilst ifb settled around 29000. See Image 2 below | ||
* 0149UT Noticed the proc file had a comment on the line indicating the switch state. The line read ''"rpfic=cross,direct'' and as such may not have loaded the correct setting and just imported the default ''rfpic=direct,direct''? | * 0149UT Noticed the proc file had a comment on the line indicating the switch state. The line read ''"rpfic=cross,direct'' and as such may not have loaded the correct setting and just imported the default ''rfpic=direct,direct''? |