This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
handover:gt10 [2017/01/22 20:53] Jesse Swan |
handover:gt10 [2017/02/01 16:34] Arwin Kahlon |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
**Summary** | **Summary** | ||
- | * 20:30 - 21 | + | |
+ | * The signal observed was very strong, the peak was also very wide (normally we centre the peak at 800 mhz and the set the span to 20 mhz, this I needed 100 mhz). I was worried that the signal might be saturating and unable to get in touch with Jim, we tried changing the variable voltage to see if it has an ef | ||
+ | - 20:30 - 21:15 UT 14 -rfpic=cross,direct | ||
+ | - 21:15 - 21:27 UT 10 -rfpic=cross,direct | ||
+ | - 21:27 - 21:35 UT 20 -rfpic=cross,direct | ||
+ | * Unable to see any change in the signal strenght on the spectrum analyser, we tried to change the modes | ||
+ | - 21:40 - 21:42 UT 20V? -rfpic=cross,cross | ||
+ | - 21:42 - 21:46 UT 20V? -rfpic=direct,direct | ||
+ | - 2146 onwards 20V? -rfpic=cross,direct | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ :handover:cross_direct-100mhz-jan23.png?nolink&300|}} | ||