This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
handover:r1659 [2014/10/27 23:31] Vasaant Krishnan |
handover:r1659 [2014/12/03 01:35] liza |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
**Hb** TR-00014 | **Hb** TR-00014 | ||
+ | * RFI spikes in ch 14, 15 (0-15) (Liza) | ||
* 22:07 UT - Windstowed (vk) | * 22:07 UT - Windstowed (vk) | ||
* 22:46 UT - Observations resumed. Missed scans: 300-2210b to 300-2241 corresponding to deficit of 36 Gb | * 22:46 UT - Observations resumed. Missed scans: 300-2210b to 300-2241 corresponding to deficit of 36 Gb | ||
Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
* 23:31 UT - Obs resumed. Missed scans: 300-2320a, 300-2325b and 300-2327 corresponding to cumulative deficit of 42 Gb | * 23:31 UT - Obs resumed. Missed scans: 300-2320a, 300-2325b and 300-2327 corresponding to cumulative deficit of 42 Gb | ||
* Hb needed manual intervention to recover from above windstows. | * Hb needed manual intervention to recover from above windstows. | ||
+ | * 301/00:43 UT - Windstowed | ||
+ | * 00:52 UT - Obs resumed. Missed scans: 301-0040, 301-0046 and 301-0050 corresponding to cumulative deficit of 62 Gb. | ||
+ | * Reported cumulative deficit with disk_pos is ~20 Gb, not 62 Gb. This is because mk5 begins to record after command to exit windstow is issued, even though the antenna drives do not activate until fs is restarted. | ||
+ | * 01:24 UT - Windstowd | ||
+ | * 07:12 UT - Returned from windstow. First scan 301-0712a. (DH) | ||
**Ke** BKG+013 | **Ke** BKG+013 | ||
* Experiment started OK by Dave (vk) | * Experiment started OK by Dave (vk) | ||
+ | * Steep slopes on chans 11 & 12 in autocorrelation plot | ||
+ | * 301/01:54 UT - disk_pos is 40 GB in excess? | ||
**Yg** USN-0035 | **Yg** USN-0035 | ||
* Experiment started OK by Dave (vk) | * Experiment started OK by Dave (vk) | ||
{{tag>}} | {{tag>}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | +SUMMARY | ||
+ | Qcode % of Total % of Correlated | ||
+ | scans scans | ||
+ | |||
+ | 5-9 89% 94% | ||
+ | 0 4% 4% | ||
+ | 4-1,A-H,N 2% 2% | ||
+ | Removed 6% - | ||
+ | |||
+ | +CORRELATOR_NOTES | ||
+ | |||
+ | +STATION_NOTES | ||
+ | |||
+ | HOBART12 (Hb/d): Missed scans: | ||
+ | from UT 300-2210b to UT 300-2241, | ||
+ | at UT 300-2320a, UT 300-2325b and UT 300-2327, | ||
+ | at UT 301-0040, UT 301-0046 and UT 301-0050, | ||
+ | from UT 301-0124 to UT 301-0712 | ||
+ | due to windstow. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that some of the above scans contribute to the | ||
+ | statistics as non-detections. | ||
+ | |||
+ | KATH12M (Ke/a): Ok. | ||
+ | |||
+ | YARRA12M (Yg/i): Ok. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Problems: Hobart12 had several windstows, one lasting ~6 hrs. | ||
+ | The cable cal at NYALES20 was unstable, with 2 breaks. | ||
+ | It was not applied. This has happened several times | ||
+ | recently and is being investigated. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Parameterization comments: None. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Other comments: None. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ----------------------------------------- | ||
+ | |||
+ | Session Statistics | ||
+ | |||
+ | Observations: 2766 scheduled | ||
+ | 2585 correlated (in database) | ||
+ | 2353 recoverable (usable) | ||
+ | 2265 used | ||
+ | Session fit: 42.591 ps | ||
+ | |||
+ | ----------------------------------------- | ||
+ | |||
+ | Station Performance | ||
+ | |||
+ | Number of Observations | ||
+ | |||
+ | Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled | ||
+ | obs used | ||
+ | |||
+ | HOBART12 690 433 422 61.2% | ||
+ | KATH12M 717 617 590 82.3% | ||
+ | YARRA12M 703 577 553 78.7% | ||
+ | --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ | ||
+ | Station Total** 2766 2353 2265 81.9% | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. | ||
+ | ** Total includes distinct observations only. | ||
+ | |||
+ | MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. | ||
+ | NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. | ||
+ | NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, | ||
+ | but the analyst rejected it all. | ||
+ | |||
~~DISCUSSION~~ | ~~DISCUSSION~~ |