This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
handover:r4738 [2016/05/05 23:52] Ross Turner |
handover:r4738 [2016/05/06 01:03] Ross Turner |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
**Hobart 12m:** | **Hobart 12m:** | ||
- | Disk VSN: HOB+0047 | + | Disk VSN: HOB+0118 (Intended to record on the other module but it reverted to this one during one of the outages/reboot, didnt know this would change the module selected) |
- | Data volume at beginning: 0 GB | + | Data volume at beginning: 30060.086 GB |
* During the **setup** had the following issues (Arwin) | * During the **setup** had the following issues (Arwin) | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
- 05:57 UT ''mk5=dot?'' respone was ''not_synced''. Opened FMSET and synced the clocks. This gave back the nominal resposne of ''syncerr_eq_0''. The time at the end was still greater than 5ms, in the range of 18 ms. The time kept drifting to higher and higher numbers and eventually had to get Jamie to help me. Jamie diagnosed it was the ntpq server that wasn't behaving very well (high offset) and he had to reboot the system. (Arwin) | - 05:57 UT ''mk5=dot?'' respone was ''not_synced''. Opened FMSET and synced the clocks. This gave back the nominal resposne of ''syncerr_eq_0''. The time at the end was still greater than 5ms, in the range of 18 ms. The time kept drifting to higher and higher numbers and eventually had to get Jamie to help me. Jamie diagnosed it was the ntpq server that wasn't behaving very well (high offset) and he had to reboot the system. (Arwin) | ||
- 06:58 UT The Lat_offsets were between 0.02 and 0.04. Zero'd the offsets after running fivept check, re-ran the fivept check to confirm Lat_offsets were below 0.02. (Arwin) | - 06:58 UT The Lat_offsets were between 0.02 and 0.04. Zero'd the offsets after running fivept check, re-ran the fivept check to confirm Lat_offsets were below 0.02. (Arwin) | ||
- | -11:59 UT WARNING: error st -27 computer acu time difference exceeded 0.25 seconds, see value above. Wiki suggesting ignoring this error as it most likely is resulting from an ongoing etransfer? | + | -11:59 UT WARNING: error st -27 computer acu time difference exceeded 0.25 seconds, see value above. Wiki suggested ignoring this error as it most likely is resulting from an ongoing etransfer? |
-17:02 UT Had the following error a few times: WARNING: error st -5 error return from antenna, see mbus error, ''antenna=open' fixed this. Brett emailed regarding a power failer at mt Pleasant around this time. | -17:02 UT Had the following error a few times: WARNING: error st -5 error return from antenna, see mbus error, ''antenna=open' fixed this. Brett emailed regarding a power failer at mt Pleasant around this time. | ||
* 18:30 UT Experiment **started ok**. (Arwin) | * 18:30 UT Experiment **started ok**. (Arwin) | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
- 21:32:19 - 21:46:08 UT Scans affected 126-2135b and possibly 126-2142 as there was a status is slewing error | - 21:32:19 - 21:46:08 UT Scans affected 126-2135b and possibly 126-2142 as there was a status is slewing error | ||
+ | * 00:35 UT onsource status is slewing for scan 127-0035 (Arwin) | ||
| |