This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
|
handover:aug027 [2016/09/06 07:05] Arwin Kahlon |
handover:aug027 [2016/09/06 14:09] (current) Jesse Swan |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| * 0404UT Auto-stow sequencing 04:04:28 to 04:23:00. Scans affected 250-0403 to 250-0422. | * 0404UT Auto-stow sequencing 04:04:28 to 04:23:00. Scans affected 250-0403 to 250-0422. | ||
| * 0650 UT disk_pos lagging by at approx 20 Gb at last check. (AK) | * 0650 UT disk_pos lagging by at approx 20 Gb at last check. (AK) | ||
| + | * Final disc pos 56 GB behind schedule (Ellen) | ||
| **Katherine 12m:** | **Katherine 12m:** | ||
| Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
| * 1400UT Experiment started OK (JS) | * 1400UT Experiment started OK (JS) | ||
| * 0650 UT disk_pos lagging by approx 55 Gb at last check. (AK) | * 0650 UT disk_pos lagging by approx 55 Gb at last check. (AK) | ||
| + | * Final disc pos 62 GB behind schedule (Ellen) | ||
| **Yarragadee 12m: ** | **Yarragadee 12m: ** | ||
| Line 41: | Line 43: | ||
| * 0040UT disk_pos is lagging by approx 60 gb. (AK) | * 0040UT disk_pos is lagging by approx 60 gb. (AK) | ||
| * 0650 UT disk_pos lagging by approx 100 Gb at last check. (AK) | * 0650 UT disk_pos lagging by approx 100 Gb at last check. (AK) | ||
| + | * Final disc pos 143 GB behind schedule (Ellen) | ||