This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
handover:gt10 [2017/01/22 21:37] Jesse Swan |
handover:gt10 [2017/02/01 16:36] Arwin Kahlon |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
**Summary** | **Summary** | ||
- | * 20:30 - 21:15 UT 14 | + | |
- | * 21:15 - 21:27 UT 10 | + | * The signal observed was very strong, the peak was also very wide (see figure below,normally we centre the peak at 800 mhz and the set the span to 20 mhz, this I needed 100 mhz). I was worried that the signal might be saturating and unable to get in touch with Jim, we tried changing the variable voltage to see if it has an ef |
- | * 21:27 - 21:35 UT 20 | + | - 20:30 - 21:15 UT 14 -rfpic=cross,direct |
+ | - 21:15 - 21:27 UT 10 -rfpic=cross,direct | ||
+ | - 21:27 - 21:35 UT 20 -rfpic=cross,direct | ||
+ | * Unable to see any change in the signal strenght on the spectrum analyser, we tried to change the modes | ||
+ | - 21:40 - 21:42 UT 20V? -rfpic=cross,cross | ||
+ | - 21:42 - 21:46 UT 20V? -rfpic=direct,direct | ||
+ | - 2146 onwards 20V? -rfpic=cross,direct | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ :handover:cross_direct-100mhz-jan23.png?nolink&300 |}} | ||