This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
handover:r4756 [2016/09/08 23:14] Jesse Swan |
handover:r4756 [2016/09/09 14:27] Jesse Swan |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* 18:30 UT - Experiment started late, during first scan sync error developed, halted schedule, first valid scan is 252-1840. This also has fixed the larger delay. (Tiege) | * 18:30 UT - Experiment started late, during first scan sync error developed, halted schedule, first valid scan is 252-1840. This also has fixed the larger delay. (Tiege) | ||
* 23:10 UT - Delay difference falling off consistently though linearly. Rate has now begun to steepen over last few scans with alarm triggered (Ross). | * 23:10 UT - Delay difference falling off consistently though linearly. Rate has now begun to steepen over last few scans with alarm triggered (Ross). | ||
+ | * 23:40 UT - Delay difference following new linear fall off, but so steep it will exceed 1ms by end of experiment. dbbc restarted. Missed scans 252-2341b and 252-2348b (Ross). | ||
** Katherine ** | ** Katherine ** | ||
Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
* 18:30 UT - Experiment started OK (Tiege) | * 18:30 UT - Experiment started OK (Tiege) | ||
+ | * 14:21 UT - From 14:19:38 to 14:21:55 got "WARNING: error st -27 computer acu time difference exceeded 0.25 seconds, see value above." As no major alarm sounded, recording continued throughout and seemed to rectify itself quickly, assumed non-critical and considered resolved. | ||
** Yarragadee ** | ** Yarragadee ** | ||
Line 26: | Line 28: | ||
~~DISCUSSION~~ | ~~DISCUSSION~~ | ||
- |