User Tools

Site Tools


hardware:hardware.mark5c

This wiki is not maintained! Do not use this when setting up AuScope experiments!

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
hardware:hardware.mark5c [2013/10/01 05:24]
Jamie McCallum created
hardware:hardware.mark5c [2013/10/02 02:50] (current)
Jamie McCallum [Mark5C Configuration]
Line 16: Line 16:
 The recording program for the mark5C is called ''​drs''​ and is (somewhat) compatible with the mark5a/​mark5b syntax. The currently installed version is 0.9.9-1 (June 2012 vintage), but a newer version is promised. ​ The recording program for the mark5C is called ''​drs''​ and is (somewhat) compatible with the mark5a/​mark5b syntax. The currently installed version is 0.9.9-1 (June 2012 vintage), but a newer version is promised. ​
  
-You can control the software either via the included ''​drs_client''​ software, or by using ''​telnet''​ or ''​nc''​ over port 2620. If you are using nc, please not that all commands need to have a trailing '';''​ to be accepted e.g ''​echo "​vsn?"​ | nc localhost 2620''​ will be rejected while 'echo "​vsn?;"​ | nc localhost 2620''​ will return the current VSN.+You can control the software either via the included ''​drs_client''​ software, or by using ''​telnet''​ or ''​nc''​ over port 2620. If you are using nc, please not that all commands need to have a trailing '';''​ to be accepted e.g ''​echo "​vsn?"​ | nc localhost 2620''​ will be rejected while ''echo "​vsn?;"​ | nc localhost 2620''​ will return the current VSN.
  
 One other note - the ''​vsn?''​ query above would fail if it was issued before setting the ''​personality''​ of the mark5c - it has no default settings. The usual sequence of commands to bring the mark5c to readiness is One other note - the ''​vsn?''​ query above would fail if it was issued before setting the ''​personality''​ of the mark5c - it has no default settings. The usual sequence of commands to bring the mark5c to readiness is
Line 51: Line 51:
 ''​pointers?''​ works as usual. ''​pointers?''​ works as usual.
  
-The time-tag of the recorded data seems to be earlier than expected - it might be that the recorded data comes from a FIFO buffer, or that there were synchronization issues with the DBBC/​Fila10G. Also, note that when recording a 4 Gbps that mark5C is allegedly unable to stop a recording reliably - the data stream has to be halted at the Fila10G first. ​+The time-tag of the recorded data seems to be earlier than expected - it might be that the recorded data comes from a FIFO buffer, or that there were synchronization issues with the DBBC/​Fila10G. ​**Update** - it's more likely due to the timing inaccuracy of the Fila10G. From APEX fringe tests, it appears that it's not uncommon for offsets of up to 2 seconds (integer and in either direction) in the recorded data. Happy fringe-finding! 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +Also, note that when recording a 4 Gbps that mark5C is allegedly unable to stop a recording reliably - the data stream has to be halted at the Fila10G first. ​
  
  
/home/www/auscope/opswiki/data/attic/hardware/hardware.mark5c.1380605064.txt.gz · Last modified: 2013/10/01 05:24 by Jamie McCallum