User Tools

Site Tools


observations_of_gnss-satellites_on_the_hobart-ceduna_baseline

This wiki is not maintained! Do not use this when setting up AuScope experiments!

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
observations_of_gnss-satellites_on_the_hobart-ceduna_baseline [2016/11/01 02:41]
Lucia McCallum
observations_of_gnss-satellites_on_the_hobart-ceduna_baseline [2016/11/01 03:00] (current)
Lucia McCallum [near field model comparison]
Line 5: Line 5:
 First results were presented during the IVS GM in South Africa [[http://​events.saip.org.za/​getFile.py/​access?​contribId=55&​sessionId=6&​resId=0&​materialId=slides&​confId=56|Hellerschmied et al.]]  and the VLBI WS for nera field targets in Bonn ([[http://​www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/​div/​meetings/​vonft/​pdf-files/​talks/​Hellerschmied_Bonn_2016.pdf|scheduling]],​ [[http://​www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/​div/​meetings/​vonft/​pdf-files/​talks/​2016_Bonn_Plank.pdf|observations]],​ [[http://​www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/​div/​meetings/​vonft/​pdf-files/​talks/​McCallum.WS2016.pdf|technical challenges]]). First results were presented during the IVS GM in South Africa [[http://​events.saip.org.za/​getFile.py/​access?​contribId=55&​sessionId=6&​resId=0&​materialId=slides&​confId=56|Hellerschmied et al.]]  and the VLBI WS for nera field targets in Bonn ([[http://​www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/​div/​meetings/​vonft/​pdf-files/​talks/​Hellerschmied_Bonn_2016.pdf|scheduling]],​ [[http://​www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/​div/​meetings/​vonft/​pdf-files/​talks/​2016_Bonn_Plank.pdf|observations]],​ [[http://​www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/​div/​meetings/​vonft/​pdf-files/​talks/​McCallum.WS2016.pdf|technical challenges]]).
  
-**We have a series (6 hours) of measured delays on the Ho-Cd baseline. If interested, we are happy to share our experience and provide data for comparisons.**  +<​note>​We have a series (6 hours) of measured delays ​of multiple GNSS-satellites ​on the Ho-Cd baseline. If interested, we are happy to share our experience and provide data for comparisons.</​note> ​ 
  
 ===== near field model comparison ===== ===== near field model comparison =====
 +
 +M. Rothacher from ETH was interested to compare the modelled delays. [[http://​fourier.phys.utas.edu.au/​wg7/​|131a_vievs.dat]] is a file containing the theoretical delyas calculated with VieVS. Values are in seconds. Time reference is time of signal reception (UT) at station 1. The delay includes the a priori hydrostatic delay as well as the antenna axis offset which is up to 8m for the Hobart26 antenna.
  
  
/home/www/auscope/opswiki/data/attic/observations_of_gnss-satellites_on_the_hobart-ceduna_baseline.1477968062.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/11/01 02:41 by Lucia McCallum