User Tools

Site Tools


operations:agenda2016_06_23

This wiki is not maintained! Do not use this when setting up AuScope experiments!

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
operations:agenda2016_06_23 [2016/06/24 04:25]
Arwin Kahlon
operations:agenda2016_06_23 [2016/06/24 04:27] (current)
Arwin Kahlon
Line 17: Line 17:
   * "​Massive delay difference, clkoff was very high (order of e-01), mk5 was about 0.5s out of sync, but reported a sync error of 0. Counter and fmset didn't fix it so restarted the DBBC. That fixed the delay but then the field system crashed and had to be restarted."​ AUG025, 14/06/2016. **(Not a problem, was resolved.)**   * "​Massive delay difference, clkoff was very high (order of e-01), mk5 was about 0.5s out of sync, but reported a sync error of 0. Counter and fmset didn't fix it so restarted the DBBC. That fixed the delay but then the field system crashed and had to be restarted."​ AUG025, 14/06/2016. **(Not a problem, was resolved.)**
   * Yg disk_pos loosing ~10 gb every 2 hours. AUG025, 14/06/2016. **(not sure why this was, escalate to Jamie)**   * Yg disk_pos loosing ~10 gb every 2 hours. AUG025, 14/06/2016. **(not sure why this was, escalate to Jamie)**
 +            - Jim's response "This may be an issue with the schedule being a little more optimistic on how much time is needed for pre-scan calibration (or similar), meaning recording always starts a little late. This is also a higher data rate experiment than our usual ones so you lose more data per unit time if things run late. I know that scheduling optimisation is something that Lucia, Davis et al have been working on for the AUG/AUA sessions. No doubt the logs will help them fine tune things some more."
 +
   * Any persistent issues with DBBC delays? r4743 09/06/2016 and r1743 07/06/2016. **(No issues since)**   * Any persistent issues with DBBC delays? r4743 09/06/2016 and r1743 07/06/2016. **(No issues since)**
   * The following two autocorrelations,​ are they okay? **(Bands 1 and 14 at ke are dodgey, Jamie to fix. If these autocorrelations were persistent, DBBC reconfiguration would be required)**   * The following two autocorrelations,​ are they okay? **(Bands 1 and 14 at ke are dodgey, Jamie to fix. If these autocorrelations were persistent, DBBC reconfiguration would be required)**
 {{: operations:​1506ut_yg.png?​200 |}}{{: operations:​1506ut_ke.png?​200 |}} {{: operations:​1506ut_yg.png?​200 |}}{{: operations:​1506ut_ke.png?​200 |}}
  
/home/www/auscope/opswiki/data/attic/operations/agenda2016_06_23.1466742323.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/06/24 04:25 by Arwin Kahlon